New specialist IP courts coming to Hong Kong SAR?

Published on 18 Jan 2019 | 2 minute read

At the recent Business of IP Asia Forum in December 2018, Hong Kong SAR’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam discussed Hong Kong SAR’s potential for growth in the intellectual property (“IP”) arena and the Government’s commitment to support the development of Hong Kong SAR as an IP trading hub for the Asia-Pacific region. 

The two Mainland China national strategies – the Belt & Road Initiative (the “Initiative”) and the Guangdong-Hong Kong SAR-Macao Greater Bay Area (“Greater Bay Area”) development are said to present immense opportunities for Hong Kong SAR.   The crucial role played by IP in the Initiative was highlighted by President Xi Jinping in a conference to Belt & Road countries in August 2018. He said that the effective use and protection of IP rights was vital to the Initiative. The growth potential of IP in the Greater Bay Area can also be illustrated by figures showing that the Greater Bay Area’s patent applications outnumbered the total of the world's three other renowned bay areas, namely Tokyo, New York and San Francisco in 2017. To this end, Ms. Lam emphasized her Government’s continuing work in setting policies and allocating funds to develop Hong Kong SAR’s IP capabilities such as:

  • the doubling of funding for three schemes under the Innovation & Technology Fund;
  • the amendment of the tax law to expand profits-tax deductions for capital expenditure incurred for the purchase of IP rights in June 2018; and
  • the establishment of an original grant patent system in 2019. 

Despite those changes, Hong Kong SAR is still seen to lack a robust legislative framework to enforce IP disputes, which is important to encourage innovation.  Unlike Mainland China, the UK, Singapore, Japan and many other jurisdictions there are no specialist IP courts, judges or lists in Hong Kong SAR.  Currently, IP cases including those involving complex technology issues are heard by generalist judges in Hong Kong SAR who often have little or no experience in adjudicating IP disputes.  This results in inconsistent judgments and substantial delays, even for interlocutory injunctions (which defeats the purpose of urgent injunctions), thereby increasing the cost of litigation. The lack of confidence in the system also leads to unwillingness on the part of those accused as well as rightsholders to litigate, with small and medium enterprises preferring to settle on unfavourable terms rather than bear the risks of going through such a costly and unpredictable system. 

In 2016, we discussed the IP arbitration changes which were at that time to be introduced.  Although new arbitration provisions which came into effect on 1 January 2018 confirm that IP disputes are now arbitrable in Hong Kong SAR, parties to IP disputes, often with no prior dealings may find it difficult to agree to arbitrate. There is therefore an equally pressing need to ensure speedy and efficient litigation of IP disputes in Hong Kong SAR, particularly as the original grant patent system is likely to lead to more litigation over patent cases. In the UK, where there are specialist IP courts with specialist judges, there are fast track procedures and a specialist court to hear smaller, simpler claims whilst more complex claims and appeals are still heard in a specialist list. The segregation allows for more streamlined processes, allowing all, including small and medium enterprises to benefit from it. 

At the time this article goes to press, the Hong Kong SAR Department of Justice has been engaged in consultations with various industry and practitioner groups for the establishment of specialist IP lists and judges though no public announcements on detailed plans have been made.  The anticipated change would no doubt complement the Hong Kong SAR Government’s other IP initiatives and lay the foundation for Hong Kong SAR to become an IP hub.

30% Complete
Rouse Editor
Editor
+44 20 7536 4100
Rouse Editor
Editor
+44 20 7536 4100