The blockchain domains much like their predecessors 15 years ago are in the early stage of market development, where newer players are taking advantage of this unique technology. Whilst some brands rush to explore this new frontier, others are still assessing the space. Here Marcin Iwankiewicz and Holly White examine the new risks and opportunities from the rise of the web3 domains, and how can Brands protect their online presence.
It seems not that long ago, there was a race for brands to register domains .com. The same can be said recently about blockchain domain names registrations. As we move towards blockchain domains system (web3), this has to be differentiated from the web2 domains naming system (DNS). DNS allowed centralised systems, such as, social media and eCommerce to flourish, including facebook.com or amazon.com. Web3 means a reliance on a decentralised public ledger system, or a blockchain, enabling seamless smooth processes with rapid processing times. As such blockchain domains operate on a specific blockchain via a 'registrar'. For instance, mcdonaldsofficial.eth found on NFT market place Opensea has been registered with Ethereum Name Service, a registrar that enable blockchain domains (.eth) running on the Ethereum blockchain.
Blockchain domain names system (BDNS) much like DNS translates unique address into a memorable phrase. In the case of DNS, it would be translating a unique IP address into a domain name, such as, twitter.com. Whereas for blockchain domain names, it is about translating a unique digital wallet (0x9b8c19500a8631c1f755bb365bDE398384E4f2Fa) to memorable address, for instance, minecraft.eth. However, unlike DNS, blockchain domains have taken domains to another frontier regarding its functionality.
What is new about Blockchain Domain Names?
This fascinating multi-usage enabled by blockchain technology truly expands many new possibilities for brands to interact with their customers.
Although we are seeing some platforms taking steps to ensure blockchain domain names are registered legitimately, such as Handshake (a blockchain domain registrar) who have reserved trademarked names for famous brands, organisations and people, we observe a high level of bad faith registration for blockchain domain names. One such instance which is well known is cybersquatting. Bad actors without any consent of the brand owners register a blockchain domain name and wait until the brand owner approaches them. The aim being to sell the blockchain domain names for a lucrative amount of money, such as, appleinc.eth listed on NFT Marketplace, OpenSea for around $600,000.
The web3 domains pose a risk to the brand’s image as clients may be misled by impersonating parties. As blockchain domain names have the ability to be used as display names, it is not hard to imagine that users with a display name, such as, “BrandXOfficial.eth”, might mislead other users that they are a brand’s official representative. Through establishing connections on social media, scammers may begin phishing or other data mining techniques to gain access to NFTs and cryptocurrencies of their victims, as was the most recent case of Seth Green who lost 4 NFTs of Bored Apes (an infamous NFT collection).
Whilst web3 domains provide unique ways for brands to interact with customers, this new technology poses a threat to brand’s image, including cybersquatting and brand impersonation. If you have any concerns or would like to know more about how to protect blockchain domain names, please contact our experts at Rouse.